The recent public instruction by President Akufo-Addo to traditional leaders to rise and greet him first has sparked a heated debate across Ghana. While some see this as a simple matter of protocol, others perceive it as an affront to the revered position of chiefs within Ghanaian society.
A Vox Pop in Kumasi Streets:
Opinions are sharply divided.
‘It’s disrespectful,’ declared Abena, a market trader, ‘Our chiefs are like fathers to us. The President should show them the respect they deserve.’
A young man named Kwame disagreed, ‘The President is the head of state. It’s only natural for others to show him respect.’
This dichotomy reflects the broader public sentiment, with strong feelings on both sides of the issue.
The Role and Power of a Chief:
In Ghana’s traditional system, chiefs hold immense power and influence. They are seen as guardians of customary law, arbiters of justice, and social and spiritual leaders. Their status is deeply rooted in the history and culture of their respective communities, commanding respect that transcends mere formality.
The Tradition of Greeting:
While the exact protocols of greeting vary across different ethnic groups, the general principle remains consistent: respect is paramount. In many cases, tradition dictates that a younger person or someone of lower status rises to greet an elder or someone of higher status.
Precedence and Historical Context:
While President Akufo-Addo’s directive has sparked controversy, it’s important to note that there have been instances in Ghana’s history where presidents have interacted with chiefs in similar ways. However, the extent to which such interactions have been publicly orchestrated and emphasized by presidents remains a point of contention.
During the time of President Kufuor, for example, interactions with traditional leaders were often characterized by a mutual respect for cultural protocols, even amidst political differences. However, the specific act of publicly instructing chiefs to rise and greet him first appears to be a more recent practice, one that has sparked significant anxieties regarding a potential shift in the power dynamics between the executive branch and traditional leadership.
Arrogance or Disrespect?
Those critical of President Akufo-Addo’s posture argue that it smacks of arrogance and disrespect towards traditional leaders. They fear this sets a dangerous precedent, undermining the long-standing authority of chiefs and potentially eroding the fabric of Ghanaian society.
Supporters, however, argue that the President is simply upholding the dignity of his office and seeking to establish an appropriate level of deference. They contend that this gesture is not a personal attack on chiefs, but rather a manifestation of the power vested in the Presidency.
Consequences and the Future:
The long-term consequences of President Akufo-Addo’s actions remain to be seen. This incident has undoubtedly strained relations between the executive branch and traditional leadership, with the potential to create further divisions within Ghanaian society.
This is a developing situation, and the continued public discourse will be crucial in shaping the future of this complex relationship between the president and the chiefs of Ghana.
Godwin Owusu Frimpong
