By Godwin Owusu Frimpong
Alan Kwadwo Kyeremateng’s emergence as a presidential candidate for the Movement for Change has raised questions about his credibility and moral integrity. Known for his previous role as a Cabinet Minister under President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo, Mr. Kyeremateng’s dramatic shift in rhetoric regarding the performance of the NPP government where he once championed its policies now invites scrutiny.
During his tenure as Trade Minister, he was a vocal advocate for the government’s initiatives, celebrating the successes of an administration he is now openly critical of, claiming it has fallen woefully short of expectations. Ghanaians are now left wondering: What has changed? Is his newfound perspective a reflection of genuine concern for the nation, or a strategic pivot born from his distance from the NPP following perceived victimization during the party’s flagbearership race?
As he passionately promises to scrap the COVID-19 levy and other “unnecessary taxes,” he accuses both the NPP and the NDC of corruption, pointing out how these financial burdens stifle economic growth and entrepreneurship. His pledge to implement the lowest tax regime in West Africa aligns with a broader narrative that positions him as a savior seeking to rescue Ghanaians from fiscal despair.
Yet, a fundamental query persists: Why did Mr. Kyeremateng not resign in protest against the very policies and corruption he now denounces? A resignation at that juncture could have served as a bold testament to his integrity and taken a clear stand against a system he now criticizes so vehemently. Instead, his decision to distance himself from the NPP only after leaving government raises eyebrows. Is this a calculated move to regain favor with the electorate, or a sincere transformation in values?
In the political theater, where accountability and transparency are paramount, voters are tasked with discerning the authenticity of his late-stage critiques and promises. As the election approaches, the spirit behind his candidacy becomes increasingly essential to examine—not only for understanding his motivations but also for assessing what this means for the future of governance in Ghana.
Godwin Owusu Frimpong
