By Godwin Owusu Frimpong
Following reports of an alleged attack on Ghanaian media personality Kofi Adoma, which some sources claim involved gunpowder striking his eye, questions are being raised about the timing and nature of Dormaahene Osagyefo Dr Agyemang Badu’s recent pronouncements.
Why has the Dormaahene publicly challenged Asantehene Otumfuo Osei Tutu II’s authority, specifically regarding the potential elevation of the Fiapre Traditional Council to paramountcy? Is the Dormaahene’s stance intended as genuine opposition, or is it a calculated act of propaganda designed to undermine the Asantehene’s influence and authority in the Bono region, where Fiapre is located? Given the historical context of Fiapre’s desire to reunite with Asanteman, does the Dormaahene’s resistance reflect a broader struggle for power and influence within Ghana’s traditional leadership structures?
A series of contentious statements by Dormaahene Osagyefo Dr Agyemang Badu against Asantehene Otumfuo Osei Tutu II have ignited a fierce debate: What compels such public and seemingly disrespectful pronouncements? The unfolding saga includes Dormaahene’s challenge regarding the potential elevation of the Fiapre Traditional Council to paramountcy and follows closely on the heels of a shocking incident involving media personality Kofi Adoma, who was reportedly shot in the eye – an event Dormaahene subtly addressed while also criticizing Otumfuo over galamsey (illegal mining).
Dormaahene has vehemently opposed Asantehene’s stated intention to elevate several divisional councils, including Fiapre, within the Bono and Ahafo Regions to paramountcy. He argues that as the head of the Dormaa Traditional Council, the authority to make such decisions concerning Fiapre rests with him, not the Asantehene. “How can you make such a pronouncement while I am still alive?” he questioned, challenging Otumfuo’s authority and going so far as to threaten abdication should the elevation proceed. He said the statement concerning paramountcy means there are no authorities above the paramount chief.
But what could be the underlying motivations for these attacks? Several factors could be at play:
- Jealousy: Could Dormaahene be envious of Asantehene’s immense influence, wealth, and historical significance within Ghana? The Asantehene holds a position of unparalleled prestige, and feelings of inadequacy could manifest as public challenges.
- Seniority and Authority: Despite being a powerful figure, Dormaahene’s jurisdiction is geographically limited. The Asantehene, on the other hand, commands considerable authority even beyond the Ashanti Region. Could this perceived power imbalance fuel Dormaahene’s resentment?
- Control and Jurisdiction: The heart of the dispute lies in the Fiapre Traditional Council’s desire to reunite with and elevate their status within the Asanteman, a move the Dormaahene sees as an infringement on his authority. Is this a battle over land, influence, and self-determination?
- Political Agenda: Are there underlying political motivations driving Dormaahene’s actions? Traditional rulers often wield considerable influence, and their pronouncements can carry significant political weight. Is Dormaahene attempting to assert his dominance within the Bono region, or is there a wider political game at play?
- Social Media Influence: Dormaahene has a strong social media presence and a large following, and it is likely that social media trolling and pressure from his followers could have fueled the attacks.
The Asantehene has cited his inherent authority to elevate councils within these regions, stating, “No one other than myself can elevate them. They are all mine.” This assertion of power appears to have triggered Dormaahene’s defiant response, leading to a public spectacle that raises serious questions about respect, tradition, and the boundaries of chiefly authority in modern Ghana.
The situation remains tense, and the long-term implications of this public feud are uncertain. Will Dormaahene follow through with his threat to abdicate? Will Asantehene proceed with the elevations, further escalating the conflict? The answers to these questions will determine the future of inter-chieftaincy relations and the stability of the region.
Godwin Owusu Frimpong
