By Godwin Owusu Frimpong
In a controversial stance that has drawn the ire of many, Ogyeahoho Yaw Gyebi II, President of the National House of Chiefs, has publicly opposed the call for a complete ban on mining in Ghana. Instead, he advocates for stricter regulations, arguing that mining is not only a vital economic contributor but also essential for job creation among the youth. This raises pressing questions regarding his loyalty to national interests, his understanding to the complex issues surrounding illegal mining, and his commitment to combatting the “national enemy” of illegal mining, known as galamsey.
Ogyeahoho’s remarks suggest a desire to strike a balance between economic growth and environmental preservation, yet critics argue that his position may overlook the urgent need for decisive action against the rampant destruction caused by illegal mining operations. By insisting on the importance of responsible mining practices rather than endorsing an outright ban, is he demonstrating a clear understanding of the issues at hand, or is it an evasion of the leadership responsibility to prioritize the long-term health of the environment over short-term economic gains?
As the representative of traditional leadership whose role is to safeguard the welfare of the community, does Ogyeahoho Yaw Gyebi II’s position signify a lack of loyalty to the very people he is supposed to protect? By not fully endorsing a ban on activities that have wreaked havoc on the nation’s ecological and social fabric, is he complicit in allowing the continuation of destructive practices under the guise of responsible mining?
His comments, while framed within the context of economic vitality, mask an underlying question of foresight. Can we truly afford to compromise the future of our natural resources for the sake of immediate economic gains when the very fabric of our country’s prosperity is at stake?
As the nation calls for strong leadership in the fight against illegal mining, it is crucial to assess whether Ogyeahoho Yaw Gyebi II’s approach aligns with a genuine commitment to safeguarding Ghana’s future or if it reflects a hesitant reluctance to confront a national enemy that threatens the lives and livelihoods of many.
Godwin Owusu Frimpong