By Godwin Owusu Frimpong
In recent weeks, Dr. Matthew Opoku Prempeh, the vice presidential hopeful, has increasingly come under fire for his spontaneous public statements. While his intentions might stem from a place of loyalty to the New Patriotic Party (NPP) and its candidate Dr. Bawumia, his comments have sparked a wave of criticism and raised pertinent questions about his preparedness for the vice-presidential role.
His recent remarks in Abossey Okai about a 24-hour economy reveal a troubling pattern of extemporaneous speech that could prove detrimental in a political landscape where every word can make or break a campaign. He argued that the proposal by the NDC’s flag-bearer was impractical and would harm local businesses, using pointed examples that underscore his belief. However, the manner in which he expressed his viewpoint—notably the bizarre assertion that “even God who created the world sleeps at night”—has overshadowed the substance of his message, turning it into fodder for ridicule instead of robust debate.
The question arises: why is Dr. Opoku Prempeh consistently allowed to speak off the cuff? In an age where political messages are meticulously crafted and curated, his lack of scripting appears reckless for someone vying for the vice presidency. It not only raises questions about his grasp of political communication but also about the overall campaign’s strategy. Is there a failure within the NPP to recognize the importance of disciplined public speaking for an individual in a leadership position?
Critics argue that Napo’s recent remarks have caused disaffection within Dr. Bawumia’s campaign team, suggesting a disconnect between the candidate and the broader goals of the party. These gaffes—whether accidental or not—paint a picture of a candidate who may not be fully prepared for the rigors of high office, creating a perception of vulnerability at a crucial juncture in the campaign.
His comments could lead one to wonder whether he is genuinely aware of international economic trends. A 24-hour economy, as proposed by Mahama, is not merely about operating businesses around the clock; it is a vision aimed at modernizing the economy, increasing employment opportunities, and fostering a vibrant business environment. By contrasting it with a narrow lens of local practice, Napo jeopardizes meaningful discourse and reduces the chance for innovative solutions tailored to modern economic challenges.
In contemplating Napo’s candidacy, one is inclined to advise him to engage in deeper reflection and preparation—perhaps even consulting his Bible, as humorously suggested. Refining his public engagement approach will not only enhance his personal gravitas but bolster the NPP’s standing in the eyes of discerning voters who are increasingly attuned to the nuances of political dialogue. If he aims for the vice presidency, understanding the complexities of Ghana’s economic landscape, and conveying those insights articulately, must become his north star.
Ultimately, Dr. Opoku Prempeh’s ex-tempore speeches are proving to be more than just moments of spontaneity; they risk destabilizing the campaign and damaging the reputation he seeks to build as a credible political leader for the future of Ghana.
Godwin Owusu Frimpong
